optimize ResponseFormat

[yileicn]

PR Type

Enhancement

---

Description

• Optimize null-coalescing assignment operator usage

• Pass ResponseFormat parameter to Execute method

• Improve code consistency and API completeness

---

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["InstructService.Execute"] -->|"Use ??= operator"| B["Simplified null assignment"]
  C["InstructModeController"] -->|"Pass responseFormat"| A
  B -->|"Cleaner code"| D["Optimized ResponseFormat"]
  C -->|"Complete parameters"| D

Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

InstructService.Execute.cs Simplify null-coalescing assignment operator                          src/Infrastructure/BotSharp.Core/Instructs/Services/InstructService.Execute.cs Replace null-coalescing conditional assignment with null-coalescing assignment operator (??=) Simplifies the responseFormat initialization logic Maintains same functionality with more concise syntax +1/-1      InstructModeController.cs Add ResponseFormat parameter to Execute call                          src/Infrastructure/BotSharp.OpenAPI/Controllers/Instruct/InstructModeController.cs Add responseFormat parameter to the Execute method call Pass input.ResponseFormat from the request to the instructor service Enables ResponseFormat configuration from API endpoint +2/-1

---

[qodo-code-review]

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
⚪	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Unvalidated request parameter: The new responseFormat: input.ResponseFormat request-driven parameter is forwarded without visible validation/normalization, so invalid/unsupported values may cause runtime errors or unexpected behavior depending on Execute implementation. Referred Code var result = await instructor.Execute(agentId, new RoleDialogModel(AgentRole.User, input.Text), instruction: input.Instruction, templateName: input.Template, files: input.Files, codeOptions: input.CodeOptions, fileOptions: input.FileOptions, responseFormat: input.ResponseFormat); Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Input validation needed: Since input.ResponseFormat is an external input now influencing LLM output formatting/processing, confirm it is constrained to an allowlist/enum and safely handled when null/unknown before calling instructor.Execute. Referred Code var result = await instructor.Execute(agentId, new RoleDialogModel(AgentRole.User, input.Text), instruction: input.Instruction, templateName: input.Template, files: input.Files, codeOptions: input.CodeOptions, fileOptions: input.FileOptions, responseFormat: input.ResponseFormat); Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
Update

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Ensure consistent API endpoint behavior To ensure consistent API behavior, pass the input.ResponseFormat to the instructor.Execute call within the InstructCompletion method, mirroring the change made in the InstructCompletionSse method. src/Infrastructure/BotSharp.OpenAPI/Controllers/Instruct/InstructModeController.cs [37-43] var result = await instructor.Execute(agentId, new RoleDialogModel(AgentRole.User, input.Text), instruction: input.Instruction, templateName: input.Template, files: input.Files, codeOptions: input.CodeOptions, - fileOptions: input.FileOptions); + fileOptions: input.FileOptions, + responseFormat: input.ResponseFormat); [To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: This is a valid and important suggestion that fixes an inconsistency introduced by the PR, where one API endpoint (InstructCompletionSse) was updated to handle responseFormat but the corresponding non-SSE endpoint (InstructCompletion) was not, leading to divergent behavior.	Medium
Update